t20: Issue to pull request -- GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
Fix a bug and add a small feature from an issue, with tests, docs and a changelog line.
Opus: 53.3 s. Sol: 180.2 s. Sol took 3.4 times as long.
Opus (s)Sol (s)
Hidden tests: Opus 8 of 8, Sol 8 of 8.
Blind judge pick: Opus (clear).
"Solution B [Opus] extracts the accent stripping and length truncation logic into well-named helper functions, making the main function much easier to read. Solution A [Sol]'s inline length calculation uses a slightly awkward array join to determine the separator length, whereas B [Opus]'s string concatenation approach is more natural and readable."
"The solution perfectly implements the requested bug fix and feature with robust logic, comprehensive tests, and excellent documentation."
"The implementation is robust, handles edge cases elegantly, and includes comprehensive tests and documentation."